A recent lawsuit alleges
The following is a brief overview of Ethicon’s product liability claims. The company manufactures and markets medical devices and has received numerous lawsuits over the past decade. The company’s products include the Parietex Composite Mesh, Plug and Patch System, and Optimized Open Skirt (PCO PM) Mesh. The product liability claims primarily involve complications resulting from the use of its products. For more information, visit the company’s website.
Parietex Composite Mesh
this implant caused the patient to experience pain, distension, and bowel perforation. The patient went to the emergency room when her abdominal pain and discomfort increased and a third surgery was required to remove the mesh. The patient continues to experience pain and discomfort and doctors anticipate further surgeries. A second case alleges that the Parietex ™ mesh implant failed to treat a patient’s severe abdominal pain.
The plaintiff claims that the Defendants’ products caused her to suffer bowel obstruction after she underwent hernia repair surgery in 2010. The plaintiff’s bowel obstruction was caused by the implant, which was intended to correct a hernia. The Parietex Composite Mesh meets Ethicon lawsuit criteria
Parietex Surgical Mesh
Many of the problems associated with the use of mesh in surgical procedures can be traced back to Covidien, a medical product maker based in Ireland. The company’s origins go back to 1903 when its founders established a textile mill to produce cotton balls and other health and hygiene products. In 2007, Tyco International purchased Covidien and today it employs 39,000 people around the world. Covidien manufactures surgical supplies and medical devices, respiratory products, and more. There are many of its products subject to recalls, including the Parietex Surgical Mesh, which is made from polyester.
While manufacturers train surgeons and professionals on the benefits of the product, the company fails to educate them about the adverse reactions associated with its use. Some victims have reported experiencing pain, infection, adhesion of the mesh to body parts, and other problems. These complications are often life-threatening. Unfortunately, many victims say they cannot seek treatment for their symptoms because their providers have misdiagnosed their hernia as a mental condition or depression. Many victims have also said that the lack of education provided to medical professionals has resulted in too many doctors inserting the mesh without sufficient training to identify and treat adverse effects.
Parietex Plug and Patch System
There are several criteria for an Ethicon lawsuit Ethicon lawsuit criteria involving the Parietex Plug and Patch System. Injuries from Parietex use polyester and other components that are particularly prone to infection. In addition, Parietex mesh is either permanent in the body or absorbable over time. In the former category, the mesh material breaks down in the body over time. The latter category remains in the body for the rest of a person’s life. The Parietex mesh was designed by medical professionals to treat hernias. However, after several reports of postoperative complications, the mesh has caused a lot of pain and suffering for many men.
The plaintiff alleges that the company acted intentionally to disregard the foreseeable harm caused by the Parietex Composite Mesh. This is based on her groin pain, which she suffered for three months. The Parietex mesh failed to hold her groin in place. The patient also developed chronic pain, which eventually required surgery to repair the problem. She is currently unable to work because of her injuries.
Parietex Optimized Open Skirt (PCO PM) Mesh
In the case of the Parietex mesh, the main problem is the fact that it is prone to infection. The company created this type of mesh using polyester and other components that are notoriously susceptible to infection. The mesh may be a permanent implant or it may break down and be absorbed by the body over time. The absorbable mesh breaks down in the body over time, while the non-absorbable mesh remains in the body forever.
The polyester mesh used by Parietex is soft and flimsy, and it is also known to cause a more severe inflammatory response than other mesh products. The mesh can cause a wide variety of complications when placed across the bowel. The company has responded by adding coatings to the polyester mesh, which have the same effect as polypropylene.
that this implant caused the patient to experience pain, distension, and bowel perforation. The patient went to the emergency room when her abdominal pain and discomfort increased and a third surgery was required to remove the mesh. The patient continues to experience pain and discomfort and doctors anticipate further surgeries. A second case alleges that the Parietex ™ mesh implant failed to treat a patient’s severe abdominal pain.
The plaintiff claims that the Defendants’ products caused her to suffer bowel obstruction after she underwent hernia repair surgery in 2010. The plaintiff’s bowel obstruction was caused by the implant, which was intended to correct a hernia. The Parietex Composite Mesh meets Ethicon lawsuit criteria
Parietex Surgical Mesh
Many of the problems associated with the use of mesh in surgical procedures can be traced back to Covidien, a medical product maker based in Ireland. The company’s origins go back to 1903 when its founders established a textile mill to produce cotton balls and other health and hygiene products. In 2007, Tyco International purchased Covidien and today it employs 39,000 people around the world. Covidien manufactures surgical supplies and medical devices, respiratory products, and more. There are many of its products subject to recalls, including the Parietex Surgical Mesh, which is made from polyester.
While manufacturers train surgeons and professionals on the benefits of the product, the company fails to educate them about the adverse reactions associated with its use. Some victims have reported experiencing pain, infection, adhesion of the mesh to body parts, and other problems. These complications are often life-threatening. Unfortunately, many victims say they cannot seek treatment for their symptoms because their providers have misdiagnosed their hernia as a mental condition or depression. Many victims have also said that the lack of education provided to medical professionals has resulted in too many doctors inserting the mesh without sufficient training to identify and treat adverse effects.
Parietex Plug and Patch System
There are several criteria for an Ethicon lawsuit involving the Parietex Plug and Patch System. Injuries from Parietex use polyester and other components that are particularly prone to infection. In addition, Parietex mesh is either permanent in the body or absorbable over time. In the former category, the mesh material breaks down in the body over time. The latter category remains in the body for the rest of a person’s life. The Parietex mesh was designed by medical professionals to treat hernias. However, after several reports of postoperative complications, the mesh has caused a lot of pain and suffering for many men.
The plaintiff alleges that the company acted intentionally to disregard the foreseeable harm caused by the Parietex Composite Mesh. This is based on her groin pain, which she suffered for three months. The Parietex mesh failed to hold her groin in place. The patient also developed chronic pain, which eventually required surgery to repair the problem. She is currently unable to work because of her injuries.
Parietex Optimized Open Skirt (PCO PM) Mesh
In the case of the Parietex mesh, the main problem is the fact that it is prone to infection. The company created this type of mesh using polyester and other components that are notoriously susceptible to infection. The mesh may be a permanent implant or it may break down and be absorbed by the body over time. The absorbable mesh breaks down in the body over time, while the non-absorbable mesh remains in the body forever.
The polyester mesh used by Parietex is soft and flimsy, and it is also known to cause a more severe inflammatory response than other mesh products. The mesh can cause a wide variety of complications when placed across the bowel. The company has responded by adding coatings to the polyester mesh, which have the same effect as polypropylene.